aircharge mfi qi iphone 7 plus wireless charging case - black reviews

These flash shots were taken in a bar. The left one is from the 7 Plus and the right is from the 8 Plus. Slow Sync Flash is definitely my favorite feature on the new iPhones even more so than Portrait Lighting Mode. And the best part? You don't have to anything but enable your flash. The iPhone takes care of the rest. See more from our iPhone 8 Plus vs. iPhone 7 Plus camera testing here. The newest iPhones -- the 8, 8 Plus and X -- all have a feature called Slow Sync Flash that makes photos taken with a flash actually look good.

There are two types of people in this world, Those who use the flash on their phone and those who don't, I fall in the latter category and do everything in my power to avoid using my phone's flash, A flash is aircharge mfi qi iphone 7 plus wireless charging case - black reviews distracting, and can make subjects look like a glowing white light zombie standing against a dark background, Flashes normally use a higher shutter speed, which in a low-light situation causes the zombie on a dark background effect, Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic, We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read, Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion..

Apple and Samsung will be heading back to court for another damages retrial. The decision follows a Supreme Court ruling a year ago that said damages could be determined differently than they typically had been in the past.  Damages for design patent infringement, the justices said, can be based only on the part of the device that infringed the patents, not necessarily on the entire product. "The Court finds that the jury instructions given at trial did not accurately reflect the law and that the instructions prejudiced Samsung by precluding the jury from considering whether the relevant article of manufacture .. was something other than the entire phone," Koh wrote in the order, handing Samsung a victory in its quest for a retrial.

Samsung said in a statement that it welcomes the new trial, "This is a historic opportunity to determine how the US Supreme Court's guidance on design patent damages will be implemented in our case and future cases," the company said, Apple didn't respond to a request for comment, The companies have been battling over patents since 2012, and a question about how much money could be owed for infringing design patents made aircharge mfi qi iphone 7 plus wireless charging case - black reviews it all the way to the Supreme Court in late 2016, In December, the highest court in the land, in a unanimous opinion, issued its ruling on the scope of the infringing "article of manufacture."That ruling reshapes the value of designs and how much one company may have to pay for copying the look of a competitor's product, Before that time, the law said an award could be collected on the entire profits of an infringing device, In this case, that's the $399 million Samsung paid Apple last last year..

Koh said the plaintiff "shall bear the burden of persuasion on identifying the relevant article of manufacture and proving the amount of total profit on the sale of that article."In a separate ruling, Koh said that a case management meeting set for Oct. 25 will still be held and that both Apple and Samsung must file plans "advancing the case schedule and trial date" by that point. Update on October 23 at 10 a.m. PT with Samsung comment. The Smartest Stuff: Innovators are thinking up new ways to make you, and the things around you, smarter.